langwidere: two characters from a gay-themed web comic embracing (melons in love)
[personal profile] langwidere
SOME SEMI-NEWS:
» In the West, we call this magic super-health drink "whiskey."
» Because I have never lost my affection for the "world news as terrible Bruce Willis/Tom Cruise vehicle" conceit, I give you the exposition sequence from Contagion.
» More news from the Computers Have Taken Over Our Lives Through Voodoo & Intimidation Desk. I am getting really tired of the "let’s blame the monkeys!" approach to modern behavioral science. Addiction to technology has nothing to do with primal impulses. This asshole’s problem is that he doesn’t like his family and finds spending time with them anesthetizing (not that I don’t sympathize; I could barely get through the article). He just needs to stop blaming his iPad and fake his own death and disappear like a normal person.
» I love it that the scientist who discovered the York gladiator cemetery is named "Kurt Hunter-Mann."
» FUCKING BALLS.

I’m choosing not to link to the upsetting stuff. Because I’m an ADULT, and I CAN DO STUFF LIKE THAT.

Hakuouki has been super-boring lately; I’m waiting for TH ('Toshizou Hijikata' — I feel comfortable calling him that because we’ve been practically friends for, like, years now) to realize that the best way to protect the emperor and save the shougun is to tell the Gerbil how he really feels about her ("I — I — to you, I’ve always — "). Or for Okita to realize that the only way to cure his tuberculosis is to lick Saitou’s nipples over and over and over. And over. Haha, just kidding, they’ll all be cherry-pink wangst zombies by this time next month.

Only two more episodes! I think! So sad. If I didn’t like the show, it would run for 38 seasons. (Looking at you, Naruto.)

No good gif material in the last few shows, so here’s one from episode seven:


Maybe someone can tell me why everybody cares so much about this Avatar: The Fifth Airblanger movie? Which is, I will remind you, a live-action adaptation of a fake anime that ran on Nickelodeon. It’s not like this is some, you know, actual thing written by and for non-white people which has been coopted by racist Hollywood. Unless there is some new definition for "fake anime" that I am unaware of, it was a borderline offensive, racist construct in the first place. But, you know, I’m trying not to judge it too harshly (AHAHA). No, really, I’m not — lots of really smart people whose opinions I trust blindly seem to think it was unbearably great, and that this movie is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord. I don’t get it. I guess I’ll just have to chalk it up to the Miyazaki Paradox and move on.

Lastly, because you care, I changed the addresses of my Tumblr account and my Formspring page. For the three people who think I’m fascinating. (HI, MOM!)

ETA: There is actually a movie called Contagion. Wow!

ETA 2: And now I know why everyone is mad at the Airblanger. Even if the original text was a chewing-gum commercial, nothing deserves that kind of treatment. Sorry. Better-informed cat is better informed. (h/t [personal profile] starburns)

Date: 2010-06-10 04:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hikari.livejournal.com
HAY did you know I could comment on entries without a DreamWidth account?! (I sure didn't!)

Here's my stab at the Airblanger thing:

it was a borderline offensive, racist construct in the first place.

It did kind of mush inspirations from different Asian countries together as if they each weren't, you know, their own individual cultural traditions. And it was a show created by two white dudes, in which most of the voice actors were also white. So... yeah, I don't think Hollywood can be held guilty for perverting some shining example of racial and cultural sensitivity.

My biggest annoyance is when people claim that the casting choices couldn't POSSIBLY have anything to do with racism or privilege. I mean, they probably weren't a result of direct, vitriolic hatred: I doubt the casting director was like, "NO, I don't like people of color, let's not put them in the movie!" It was probably more along the lines of, "Okay, we have to cast these sibling characters [from a 'tribe' whose members were depicted as having much darker skin-tones than any of the other characters (http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/2/26454/861292-sokka_katara_aang_super.jpg)]... that kid from the Twilight movies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_Rathbone) is popular. We could cast an actor of color in the brother role, but this white teen heartthrob will really help sell the movie to teen/pre-teen girls. So we'll cast him. Also, since he's white, we have to cast a white girl as his sister."

The fact that this sort of reasoning is still making it a million times harder for non-white actors to find work in Hollywood is wrong. And it's extra-icky when people ignore or deny it it. A lot of people were, though! You should have seen 'em! It was embarrassing.

(It's worth noting, though, that those sibling characters were both voiced by white actors in the original show.)

As for the general consensus of fans... I think it's that, whether or not Avatar was ever a great example of racial sensitivity, the fact that all of the characters were from Asian and First Nations -inspired cultures would've been a good opportunity for mainstream Hollywood to start breaking some barriers, as far as giving non-white actors leading roles instead of relegating them to bit parts. That didn't happen, and people were disappointed.


(What's the Miyazaki Paradox?)
(deleted comment)

Date: 2010-06-11 08:16 pm (UTC)
starburns: (Default)
From: [personal profile] starburns
JEEZ SORRY, that was long. And I messed up an italics tag there at the end, which is bugging the crap out of me. I don't have a paid account though, so I can't edit it. (I was going to just buy an account, but someone stole my check/credit card! Or I lost it. Maybe. Either way, no credit card for a week. Sads!)

SORRY. :{

Date: 2010-06-14 07:06 pm (UTC)
starburns: (Default)
From: [personal profile] starburns
OMG THANK YOU.

You can edit your own comments if you have a paid account. Otherwise, LOL NO. Or, such is my understanding. Works the same on LiveJournal, unless you have an "early adopter" account. Which I do, thankfully. (That account is almost 11 years old...)

Basically, it's a enticement to shell out for a paid account. I think.
starburns: (Default)
From: [personal profile] starburns
I mean, they clearly had no idea why a crucifixion could be considered "offensive,"

Yeah, apart from everything else, this is really silly. I mean... these people know that Jesus wouldn't have been the only person to ever be crucified, right? It wasn't even a method of punishment used specifically for Christians! (And according to ze Wikipedia, it was even a method of execution used in Japan.)

But, I don't know, I guess Christianity just gets to declare a monopoly on whatever it sees fit. It's worked before!

Uh-oh, you mean I made exactly the same argument, only backwards? Ooops.

Well, I'm totally white so I don't think my opinion is anywhere close to the definitive word on this, BUT: backward, I strikes me as a different argument. Making an effort to cast actors of color in roles that aren't already "racially defined" seems more like a small step toward correcting what's already a huge, obvious imbalance. In Hollywood, white people are already overwhelmingly favored in just about every way. I mean, I'm sure there are people out there who'd like to pretend that we're already so advanced, as a society, that we honestly don't/shouldn't think about race ever when casting. But since, when people do say that, it still ends up being white people that they cast 90% of the time... I think it's safe to say we're not there yet. (And people don't really want a "colorblind" society, right? People want to be allowed to celebrate/appreciate their heritage? My only "culture" is American, really, but this is what I assume.)

I'd say, at this point, a conscious effort to correct the imbalance would be good. I highly doubt there'll be any poor, white actors forced out onto the streets because of it.

If everyone had a mom as awesome as yours, we wouldn't still be reading so many studies and articles like this.


Okay, so Hindi films are like... imagine the big, gaudy, corny Roger's & Hammerstein-style musicals of the '60s. Then imagine that never went out of style.

(I'm painting with a REALLY WIDE brush here. There are Hindi films of all kinds. But the ones that are really big, mainstream, top-billing affairs usually fall into the above category.)


I've never read Howl's Moving Castle, so I wasn't able to judge the movie against the book. The Nausicaa movie is, indeed, not so great. The manga is actually longer and more "sophisticated" (er): the manga is four volumes long, and the plot of the movie covers only the first. Not that there aren't any criticisms of the manga to be made, but. Yeah.
starburns: (Default)
From: [personal profile] starburns
Possibly because they were functionally illiterate.

That, or completely incapable of critical thinking. Or both!

Do we honor it? Or ignore it? Is there some way to ignore it while honoring it? Let’s do that one!

(I think I vaguely remember that episode.)

In my own personal experience, statements about being "colorblind" (in the racial sense) are usually made by white people who haven't realized that being able to completely ignore race--or, more likely, pretend they're ignoring it--is a comfort their own white privilege affords them. (That's just my own experience, though: I don't know, maybe there are others who use the term with more sensitivity.)


The Hindi film industry has a new "most beautiful woman in the world" every couple years, too.