Porn Kills Well, I suppose technically porn could kill, in the sense that I could possibly smother to death under a pile of all my dirty Japanese comic books — but someone would have to sneak into my house while I was asleep and try to bury me under them without my noticing. So, I’m not too terribly worried.
Of course sexual arousal is evil! You should always deny your attractions toward other adult humans. Catholic priests all over the world have proved the truth of that statement. Over and over and over.
Ah, well. I didn’t know The Sun was a crap paper. I know to be leery of The Mail and The Telegraph (which even very non-British critics call The Torygraph), so I will add The Sun to the list. I don’t really mind all the "NOT GAY NOT GAY NOT GAY LALALA I CAN’T HEAR YOU" production wank; I was offended by Cumberbatch’s (apparent) suggestion that gay men aren’t "male," but that they are all "camp." And fabulous dressers, of course. That was horrid. But — if the source just copied & pasted his comments together in order to make something that looked like a cogent interview out of a bunch of scrap sound bites, then possibly he didn’t intend for those words to have anything to do with Sherlock’s sexuality. Maybe he was just giving his analysis of the character? Or something? Also, I cannot conceive of a world in which any British stage actor could be any kind of a homophobe, even a reflexive one :[
it's probably best if I don't show you this utterly confusing animation So, this was my reaction, in order: 1.) What is Kirk Douglas in a top hat doing in this animation? 2.) "He has a posh name"? He does? I thought posh names looked like 'Huntington Buffington-Weatherington VII.' I thought he had a name like a Beatrix Potter character. 3.) Ham? 4.) Okay, ham! 5.) This is actually fairly hilarious. 6.) Brown-people fans in the background! 7.) Does it stop? 8.) It doesn’t stop. 9.) I don’t think I can turn it off. 10.) I can’t turn it off. 11.) It’s still playing. 12.) Right now! 13.) THE END
no subject
Date: 2010-10-31 12:17 am (UTC)Well, I suppose technically porn could kill, in the sense that I could possibly smother to death under a pile of all my dirty Japanese comic books — but someone would have to sneak into my house while I was asleep and try to bury me under them without my noticing. So, I’m not too terribly worried.
Of course sexual arousal is evil! You should always deny your attractions toward other adult humans. Catholic priests all over the world have proved the truth of that statement. Over and over and over.
Ah, well. I didn’t know The Sun was a crap paper. I know to be leery of The Mail and The Telegraph (which even very non-British critics call The Torygraph), so I will add The Sun to the list. I don’t really mind all the "NOT GAY NOT GAY NOT GAY LALALA I CAN’T HEAR YOU" production wank; I was offended by Cumberbatch’s (apparent) suggestion that gay men aren’t "male," but that they are all "camp." And fabulous dressers, of course. That was horrid. But — if the source just copied & pasted his comments together in order to make something that looked like a cogent interview out of a bunch of scrap sound bites, then possibly he didn’t intend for those words to have anything to do with Sherlock’s sexuality. Maybe he was just giving his analysis of the character? Or something? Also, I cannot conceive of a world in which any British stage actor could be any kind of a homophobe, even a reflexive one :[
it's probably best if I don't show you this utterly confusing animation
So, this was my reaction, in order:
1.) What is Kirk Douglas in a top hat doing in this animation?
2.) "He has a posh name"? He does? I thought posh names looked like 'Huntington Buffington-Weatherington VII.' I thought he had a name like a Beatrix Potter character.
3.) Ham?
4.) Okay, ham!
5.) This is actually fairly hilarious.
6.) Brown-people fans in the background!
7.) Does it stop?
8.) It doesn’t stop.
9.) I don’t think I can turn it off.
10.) I can’t turn it off.
11.) It’s still playing.
12.) Right now!
13.) THE END